Home » Blog » Grow your Blog » SEO Tips » How to write helpful content that ranks on Google – lessons from the Helpful Content Update

10 Comments

  1. Thanks for this excellent summary of the HCU! I recently acquired a blog in a niche that I am an expert in. The site got hit by the HCU and I am struggling with the order in which I change things to allow recovery to occur. I’ve audited all the pages, and there are definitely posts that would qualify as “unhelpful content”; these would include reviews and roundup reviews of equipment that is done with information compiled elsewhere, and not with first hand experience. Should these pages be a) deleted or b) de-indexed ? We also have lots of quality first-hand reviews, and we are creating a complete series of ‘how-to’ articles written by subject matter experts. I hope that this will allow us to recover. Thoughts?

    1. Great to hear you found my article helpful! Are you planning to replace the reviews of equipment that is done with information compiled elsewhere with first hand reviews? If so, I would keep those pages indexed and replace them with the first hand / improved versions as soon as possible. That way you will have the best of both worlds – the benefit on an established URL and first hand reviews / truly helpful content. If not, then personally I would delete them as they are not benefiting your readers and hampering your recovery. You want every article on your website to be truly helpful and beneficial to your intended audience. I would also advise you to look at your UX and E-E-A-T, since improving UX and E-E-A-T will also help you recover from the HCU, as well as benefit your blog traffic long term. Here are a couple of articles to help with that >> https://www.productiveblogging.com/eat/ https://www.productiveblogging.com/improve-user-experience/ Wishing you a successful and speedy recovery! Eb 🙂

  2. Thanks for this article. I’d like to ask a question. Our SEO company is building links for us, at about 4-6 links per month, and the links are all on sites with a good ranking (DA or DR), and they are all blogs. However, the articles they are writing are absolutely rubblish, making no sense at all to a reader who is expert in the field. They said don’t worry about it, and we can’t write the blogs because the blog owner might not accept them. So I’m really confused. This SEO company is well known throughout the web and rank highly including in recommendations from leading SEO thought leaders. But I’m worried that google’s software will eventually become clever enough to read this stuff and know that it’s rubbish, and eventually penalize us.

    1. To me that sounds very much like ‘black hat’ link building, where an SEO company pays one website to publish a link to another website – in this case your website. My big question would be… is this SEO company paying the websites who are linking back to you for those backlinks? If they are, this is against Google’s Terms of Service and you could get penalized or even removed altogether from Google Search.

      I am referring to Google’s specific policy on link spam, which you can find here: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/essentials/spam-policies#link-spam

      Google says the following:
      Google uses links as an important factor in determining the relevancy of web pages. Any links that are intended to manipulate rankings in Google Search results may be considered link spam. This includes any behavior that manipulates links to your site or outgoing links from your site. The following are examples of link spam:
      • Buying or selling links for ranking purposes. This includes:
      • Exchanging money for links, or posts that contain links
      • Exchanging goods or services for links
      • Sending someone a product in exchange for them writing about it and including a link

      They go on to say:
      Our spam policies help protect users and improve the quality of search results. To be eligible to appear in Google web search results (web pages, images, videos, news content or other material that Google finds from across the web), content shouldn’t violate Google Search’s overall policies or the spam policies listed on this page. These policies apply to all web search results, including those from Google’s own properties. We detect policy-violating content and behaviors both through automated systems and, as needed, human review that can result in a manual action. Sites that violate our policies may rank lower in results or not appear in results at all.

      In other words, if your SEO company is paying these websites for ‘follow’ backlinks to your site you are risking getting a manual penalty from Google and being demoted in or potentially removed from Google search.

      Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but if this company is paying for backlinks on your behalf then they are not a good SEO company and this is absolutely not good SEO practice in 2024. (And hasn’t been for a really long time!)

      1. Thank you. I don’t “think” they are paying for the links, not 100% sure, its possibly more something akin to those “help a writer out” services. My concern is that the articles themselves, well, they actually look good and at first glance they seem well written and high quality content (and almost certainly not AI written), BUT when you actually read what it says and you are a subject matter expert, its absolute rubbish. The links to our site often don’t even mention our company name, they are just embedded in the a href= with the link text being the Microsoft or other product being talked about.

        1. I would ask them outright if they are paying for those articles they are placing on blogs. Because that is by far and away the biggest concern here. If they are paying for those links (and I’d be surprised if they weren’t – that is how these companies normally operate) then you risk being demoted or removed completely from search. If they are not paying for those links, then it’s a bit more of a grey area (but still definitely NOT white hat SEO!) Google knows about these spammy / low quality guest posts. Their AI can spot patterns and trends, and a lot of what they’ve been doing lately is to try and rid these low quality articles from Google Search. (And they count as low quality /spammy if they are not helpful to the intended audience!) So, best case scenario these links they are building for you are probably worthless. And worst case scenario, yes they might even be doing you harm. And, just for the record, a serious blogger would not be accepting articles like this full stop. I would never accept a guest article on either of my sites that was ‘absolute rubbish’.

  3. Thanks again. I can now confirm they don’t pay for posts, they are HARO type blog posts. I’ve approached the company with a request to fix the accuracy issues, since you can plug the article straight into chat gpt to tell if its rubbish or not and chat gpt does a great job of answering that in seconds, so hopefully they will fix it now.

    1. Oh OK, that’s good to hear. Hopefully the situation will improve now. It is still surprising that any decent website would accept an article on their website that is not good quality and the thing you say about the link text being Microsoft or something else strange is also ringing alarm bells. Which leads me to think that the websites in question are not good quality websites. They certainly sound like exactly the sort of website Google is looking to get rid of in Search with their most recent ‘Helpful Content’ focused updates and it does make me question whether the links back to your website are actually worth anything to you at all.

  4. Really great post ! I just discovered your blog and I finally found something that makes me hopeful. I started a blog in august, but just changed the hosting and passed to WordPress (and changed the domain name..) so basically I am just starting. BUT I have been reading and watching a lot of videos about the recent algorithm change and all. And I find that everyone was hit so hard, it’s scary. So I finally found your blog and it makes me hope that it is actually possible to start/continue blogging in 2024 ! I am following you everywhere and subscribed to your emails. Thank you !

    1. That’s so great to hear! And thank you for following/subscribing 😀 Yes, you are right, there is a lot of doom and gloom around at the moment. And in some ways it’s very understandable. Google was a really reliable source of high volume traffic and many people have been able to make a very good living just from Google traffic + ad income. Unfortunately, with recent Google updates many bloggers lost huge amounts of traffic and so also huge amounts of income. It’s been a real wake up call to the blogging community that relying on a third party for all, or nearly all, your income is a very precarious place to be. Some people have concluded that blogging is dead and are giving up, but personally I believe blogging is alive and kicking, and will be for many, many years to come. What is changing is the model of blogging. I cover this topic in more depth in this post >> https://www.productiveblogging.com/is-blogging-finally-dead/ and this post >> https://www.productiveblogging.com/blogging-is-changing-what-you-need-to-do-to-succeed/ You might also like to read this post >> https://www.productiveblogging.com/who-moved-my-cheese-lessons/ Wishing you every success with your new blog! Eb 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.